In the notorious fracas between actor Ben Affleck, comedian Bill Maher and neuroscientist Sam Harris, one thing became abundantly clear: Islam apologists seem incapable of distinguishing ideology from people. Here is an image I created to illustrate the point, which is not difficult to comprehend.
Maher and Harris were correct, and Affleck was simply wrong. It should be emphasized that we are discussing an ideology, not “attacking all Muslims.” We critics are referring to Islam’s doctrines, not its devotees, except those who follow the violent and bigoted doctrines fanatically. That exception means that we are not talking about all those who do not follow these objectionable doctrines. By singling out the doctrines that are objectionable, it should be obvious we are not addressing those who do not follow them! It is apologists like Affleck who are lumping in ALL Muslims with the fanatics who do subscribe to these hateful, bigoted and violent doctrines.
It’s the IDEOLOGY, stupid!
Below are doctrines found within Islamic texts, traditions and history over the past 1,400 years, justified frequently by Muslim authorities of some kind – it is THESE IDEAS that we object to. A collection of IDEAS is an “IDEOLOGY,” which is not equivalent to people.
Death to apostates
Sex slavery and rape
Brutality against homosexuals
Bigotry and hatred
Robbery and pillage
Extortion of nonbelievers
Persecution and/or death for blasphemy/atheism
Prohibition of music/singing
Destruction of pre-Islamic antiquities
Affleck generalizes ALL people under Muslim domination
Ben Affleck obviously knows nothing about Islam’s history, as its fanatical votaries swept out of Arabia and slaughtered tens to hundreds of millions of nonbelievers. He seems to think that being a Muslim is a choice for ALL Muslims. It is not. Millions of Iranians, for example, HATE Islam and don’t want this Arab invader cult in their country, much less dominating them.
Islamopanderers like Ben Affleck only help anchor the fetters of the millions of HUMAN BEINGS who want be FREE of Islam. He should be ashamed of his sorry self.
Here’s an Iranian ex-Muslim who actually KNOWS Islam, unlike the mouthy Affleck: http://AmilImani.com
Here is a message I received from another Iranian:
Those who are not receiving the truth about Islam may end up like the poor girls from Austria who joined ISIL and became “disillusioned.” I blame Islam’s non-Muslim defenders in significant part for such tragic episodes. If these girls had heard the unvarnished truth, they may never have ruined their lives and those of their children.
Playing the racism card
By shrieking “racist!” Affleck is part of a movement worldwide that has essentially destroyed the meaning of the word “racism,” making it more difficult for those who truly are experiencing real racism. It should not need to be said that ISLAM IS NOT A RACE, but apparently we need to reiterate that fact repeatedly, since Islam’s apologists just don’t get it.
Moreover, because the Western world does not tend to abide by outdated and barbaric blasphemy laws, it is obvious that shouting “racism!” and “Islamophobia!” is now a substitute to oppress free speech.
And while Affleck was freaking out and ranting about criticizing Islam being “gross” and “racist,” he seems to have no problem mocking Christianity, as in his film “Dogma.” If we are not being hypocritical, we must label Affleck as a “gross racist” for doing so. By Affleck’s “standards,” criticizing Christianity is an “attack on ALL Christians.”
And speaking of “Dogma,” Affleck’s good buddy Kevin Smith, director of the Christianophobic film “Dogma,” was questioned about a follow-up movie, which he said would have to include Islam. Smith demurred, however, evidently because he is afraid of Islam’s fanatical followers attacking him and his family. Did Affleck vent a spleen at his buddy Kevin for daring to assert that Islam’s followers can be violent?
During the debate, when discussing the people who follow Islam, rather than simply the ideology itself, Harris and Maher appealed to actual statistics about what Muslims believe. Their claims are borne out largely by the facts according to various polls and scientific studies.
Not the least important of these shows a sexist and misogynistic trend, as we would expect, since Islam’s most commonly followed doctrines include the denigration of women.
Here’s the original debate.
Sam Harris’s follow-up interview with Lawrence O’Donnell brilliantly summarizes the issues. He says pretty much what I would have said.
David Wood is a Christian apologist, but he’s got the facts about Islam.
Liberals can’t handle the truth about Islam’s woes
What is Islamic law/sharia?
What does the Koran say about nonbelievers?
What does the Koran say about women?
What the Muslim world believes, on everything from alcohol to honor killings, in 8 maps, 5 charts
Maher, Harris, Kristof, Steele, and Affleck squabble about Islam
The Sam Harris, Ben Affleck, Bill Maher & Islam Fiasco
From Obscenity to Clarity: A Factual Understanding of the Maher-Affleck Islam “Debate”
Ben Affleck: Portrait of Islam’s Clueless Apologists